4 Discussion
MAF is a common complication during labor. Though it is difficult to distinguish between physiologic and pathologic MAF, there is a small body of evidence linking it to adverse neonatal outcomes such as meconium aspiration syndrome,3 respiratory distress,4 neonatal sepsis,5 need for resuscitation,6 NICU admission,7 and low Apgar score.8
Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns in MAF mothers are linked to an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.9 When facilities such as electronic fetal heart monitoring and fetal blood sampling are unavailable, it is difficult to decide whether to allow labor to continue or perform a CS.2 Even after CS, meconium aspiration syndrome can still occur, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality in newborns.10 This implores the critical question of whether the presence of meconium alone, even in a normal fetal heart rate and pattern, indicates CS or whether a vaginal delivery can be allowed. Obstetricians in our tertiary center take two approaches to MAF mothers with normal fetal heart patterns: those who allow the vaginal delivery to continue and those who perform CS immediately after detecting the meconium. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the second to compare the neonatal outcome of MAF pregnancies based on delivery method.
The first study in 1995 on 150 mothers diagnosed with MAF showed that despite the high rate of neonatal mortality and morbidity, the mode of termination did not affect the incidence of these outcomes.10 In line with a previous study, our findings also revealed no significant differences in neonatal outcomes in terms of first and 5-min Apgar score, asphyxia, NICU admission, and neonatal death rates between those who underwent CS and those who gave birth vaginally. Another retrospective study on all patients undergoing elective CS with singleton pregnancies revealed that the incidental finding of MAF during elective CS was not associated with increased risks of adverse neonatal outcomes.11
Based on our findings, initial resuscitation steps were required more frequently in MAF mothers with NVD than in those with CS. According to the updated recommendation of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association in 2015, the MAF newborn with reasonable respiratory effort and muscle tone should be allowed to stay with the mother for the first steps in newborn care. A bulb syringe can gently clear meconium from the mouth and nose if necessary. If the MAF newborn has poor muscle tone and inadequate breathing, the initial resuscitation steps should be completed under the radiant warmer. The remainder of the initial resuscitation steps should be performed on the vigorous meconium-stained infant. After intrapartum suctioning, the non-vigorous infant should be placed in the radiant warmer bed, and direct laryngoscopy should be performed to suction residual meconium from the hypopharynx (under direct vision) and to intubate and suction the trachea. Both drying and stimulation should be postponed. Suction should be applied through a meconium aspirator device attached directly to the endotracheal tube, and suction should be applied as the endotracheal tube is withdrawn from the airway. Advanced resuscitation intervention to support ventilation and oxygenation, including intubation or suction, should be initiated for each infant as indicated if the airway is obstructed.12
Breastfeeding in the first hour of life is essential for good neonatal outcomes. In our study, we decided to include this aspect as it is an essential part of newborn care. According to our findings, the ratio of breastfed infants within the first hour did not differ between the CS and NVD groups, suggesting that both methods of delivery did not significantly impact early breastfeeding initiation.
Overall, our study provides valuable insights into the management of MAF pregnancies and underscores the importance of adhering to updated guidelines for neonatal care and resuscitation to optimize outcomes for MAF newborns.
The current study has several strengths that contribute to its reliability and validity. One major strength is the meticulous exclusion of all variables that could potentially confound the results, such as underlying maternal disease, abnormal labor, and fetal heart rate. Only single mothers without underlying disease or abnormal conditions were examined. In other words, the net effect of meconium as an independent variable on neonatal outcomes in mothers who gave birth vaginally versus mothers who underwent CS solely because of meconium was investigated in this study. We did not divide the cases in our study based on meconium consistency. Thin or thick meconium may result in a different neonatal outcome. Another limitation was the small sample size. These limitations must be considered in future research.