Discussion
EP is a significant obstetric concern, particularly in developing nations, where ruptured EPs account for 5%–10% of pregnancy-related deaths and contribute to 9%–14% of maternal mortality in the first trimester.12 Diagnosis of women with a pregnancy of unknown location necessitates multiple visits for blood tests and ultrasound examinations. Delays in diagnosis can lead to ruptured EPs, impaired fertility and life-threatening intra-abdominal haemorrhage, particularly problematic during 4–6 weeks of gestation when ultrasound findings are inconclusive and serial total β-hCG measurements pose risks due to delayed diagnosis. Early detection of EP can prevent morbidity associated with delayed treatment, inappropriate management strategies and adverse effects on future pregnancies.13
The current approach to identifying EP involves a combination of ultrasound and total β-hCG measurements, neither of which is the gold standard. Ultrasound can only detect 8%–26% of EPs during the initial 4–7 weeks of gestation, and the total β-hCG discriminatory zone offers limited diagnostic assistance,14 particularly when ultrasound findings are inconclusive. Although a total β-hCG level below 1500 mIU/mL raises suspicion for EP after 8 weeks of gestation,15 EPs can occur at any total β-hCG level as this cut-off is not gestational age-dependent.
Protein markers
In this study, we evaluated total β-hCG along with progesterone, sFLT-1 and miRs. Diagnostic confirmation in normal pregnancies relied on ultrasound in all cases, while EP diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound in 113 cases and laparotomy in 7 cases.
The average total β-hCG in normal pregnancy was 73 809 mIU/mL, compared with 5016 mIU/mL in EP,4 indicating a significant difference. Conversely, to achieve maximum sensitivity and specificity, it is imperative to establish a significant threshold of 25 126 mIU/mL for the total β-hCG, which surpasses the typically used discriminant level.
In the current investigation, the mean concentration of progesterone during a normal pregnancy was observed to be 24.6±8.8 ng/mL,16 which markedly differs from the level of 6.4±3.8 ng/mL detected in the EP group,17 indicating a statistically significant disparity. A 2012 meta-analysis by Verhaegen et al18 showed progesterone’s ability to distinguish non-viable pregnancies with 74.6% sensitivity and 98.4% specificity, but not EP or other anomalous intrauterine pregnancies. Al-Bayati et al suggested a cut-off of 11.7 ng/mL.19
The mean sFLT-1 concentration in normal pregnancy was 1148.4 pg/mL, reduced to 396.7 pg/mL in the EP group,20 nearly one-third of the normal population. Daponte et al21 reported the mean sFLT-1 levels in normal pregnant women to be 1390.32±655.37 pg/mL and 288.79±375.76 pg/mL for failed pregnancies (including EP and missed abortions). Dominguez et al observed lower sFLT-1 levels in normal pregnancy (505 pg/mL) compared with EP (84 pg/mL).22 Despite fluctuations in mean sFLT-1 levels, there was a 75%–80% decrease in the EP group.
MicroRNAs
In our study, eight miRs showed differential expression, with four downregulated and four upregulated. Although miR-323-3p was previously highlighted for EP detection, its sensitivity in our study was lower.23 miR-873, proposed as a marker for early EP detection, exhibited reduced sensitivity compared with previous findings.24 According to Zhao et al,23 miR-323-3p concentration was notably elevated in EP, showing more promising results than miR-517a, miR-519d and miR-525-3p, with a sensitivity rate of 37% when used as a single marker. However, in this study, miR-323-3p, miR-517a and miR-523-3p demonstrated sensitivities of 17.1%, 68.6% and 11.4%, respectively. Miura et al24 also found significant statistical differences in the plasma concentration of cell-free pregnancy-associated miRs—miR-323-3p, miR-515-3p, miR-517a, miR-517c and miR-518b—and the concentration of β-CG among women with spontaneous abortion (SA), EP and normal pregnancies.
In 2017, Lu et al25 proposed miR-873 as a single, non-invasive and stable marker for early EP detection. miR-873 exhibited the highest sensitivity of 61.76% as a single marker at a fixed specificity of 90%. However, in this study, its sensitivity was only 38.6%, at 90% specificity.25 Lu et al25 also identified miR-141 and miR-218 to be differentially expressed between EP, VIP and SA groups. Nonetheless, in this study with a larger sample size, miR-141 showed a poor sensitivity of 25% and miR-218 had a sensitivity of 30% in distinguishing EP from a normal pregnancy.25 Lu et al25 suggested that miR-223 is significantly downregulated in EP compared with SA, which contrasts the findings of Dominguez et al,22 who showed upregulation in EP women. However, the diagnostic potential of miRs was limited, with sensitivities less than 20% at fixed specificities of 90% and 95%.
miR-519d demonstrated promise with high specificity but insufficient sensitivity as a single biomarker for EP detection, highlighting the need for further investigation.
Performance of biomarker combinations
Comparing the diagnostic performance of individual markers, sFLT-1 stands out with high sensitivity (98.6%) and negative predictive value (98.4%), aligning with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines that dismiss progesterone as a single biomarker. Combining it with total β-hCG did not alter sensitivity or specificity significantly. However, adding progesterone (<14.4 ng/mL) to sFLT-1 increased sensitivity to 100%, with lowered specificity (85%).
The inclusion of miR-519d with sFLT-1 significantly improved specificity, despite its lower sensitivity (47.1%). Combining sFLT-1 with miR-519d enhanced sensitivity to 100% with good specificity (87.1%).
Further investigation into miR expression in EP and non-viable pregnancies is warranted. Estimating circulating miR levels alongside sFLT-1 could aid in early EP prediction and treatment decisions, given miRs’ stability in circulation.
miR gene targets and pathway analysis
miR gene targets and pathway analysis were conducted using miRBase and DIANA - mirPath tools (table 4). For additional information, refer to online supplemental table 1. These tools predict miR target genes and regulatory mechanisms, indicating potential roles in microRNA degradation and protein translation inhibition.
For instance, miR-519d upregulates HOXA10 gene expression, relevant to mullerian duct development at ectopic implantation sites in the fallopian tube. It also facilitates intercellular communication between trophoblast and immune cells via extracellular vesicles.26 miR-873 and miR-517a regulate the PROKR2 gene, impacting prokineticin dysregulation in the fallopian tube, which is crucial for smooth muscle contractility and embryo tubal transport.26 miR-141 also modulates PROKR2, influencing prokineticin dysregulation and facilitating intercellular communication between trophoblast and immune cells.26 miR-218 affects mucin-type O-glycan biosynthesis and the extracellular matrix receptor interaction pathways, playing a role in prokineticin dysregulation via the PROKR2 gene.26 However, pathways influenced by miR-223, miR-523 and miR-323-3p were not deduced. miR-223, for instance, targets GALNT7, GALNT1 and GALNT13 genes involved in mucin biosynthesis, potentially altering mucin expression in EP tissues.22
Limitations
A larger sample size is needed for further validation of miR testing. The performance of these miRs may vary based on the specific condition and the population under study. This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of combined markers for EP, regardless of gestational age. However, it did not specifically examine small or premature EPs. Future studies are suggested to investigate the diagnostic utility of this method in detecting small or premature EPs with a focused cohort study. This study focuses on sFLT-1’s role in EP, neglecting its application in pre-eclampsia or its diagnostic distinction between the two conditions.
Implications of the study
These miRs hold potential for early routine screening of EP in conjunction with protein biomarkers like progesterone and sFLT-1, enhancing sensitivity and specificity. This approach could offer time-saving, cost-effective and painless testing, ultimately reducing the complications associated with EP.